Most compliance software is built for one buyer and stretched to fit everyone else. We built AirComply the other way: the platform is one engine, permit deconstruction, live tracking, document generation, cited answers, but the workspace on top of it is shaped to the job in front of you. There are three, and the fastest way to understand the product is to walk them.
The Facility workspace
A facility EHS manager lives inside one permit, deeply. The workspace opens on that permit's reality: how many conditions are tracked, what is due in the next 30 days, what needs attention now. Emission watch shows rolling totals against limits, a VOC cap at 89 percent with the trend visible, so the conversation about curtailment happens before the exceedance, not in the deviation report after. When reporting season arrives, the semi-annual report and annual certification generate pre-filled from the tracked record and stage for the Responsible Official's signature. And when a question comes up, what happens if we exceed the cap, which conditions govern EU-003, the chat answers from the permit itself, citations attached.
The Consultant workspace
A consultant's problem is not depth on one permit; it is breadth across twenty. The workspace opens on the book of business: every deadline for every client on one screen, overdue items surfaced, this month's obligations ranked. Each client folder holds a full deconstructed register, so picking up any client's question takes minutes, not a file-review afternoon. Deliverables draft from the registers: compliance reports, applicability memos, and analysis work like top-down BACT, where the workspace ranks control options, pulls comparable RBLC determinations, and drafts the condition language, all of it cited, all of it staged for the professional whose name goes on the deliverable. The economics of that shift are the subject of our margins article.
The Agency workspace
Reviewers have the least glamorous queue in the field and some of its hardest deadlines. The Agency workspace organizes pending applications with their review clocks visible, runs completeness checks so deficiency letters go out in days instead of weeks, and cross-references proposed BACT limits against recent determinations. The reviewer's judgment call remains the reviewer's; the workspace makes sure it is made with the precedent on the table and the clock in view.
Same engine, same rules
All three workspaces run on the same four commitments: every value cites its source, regulations retrieve live, calculations run in code, and nothing is submitted on AI authority. The workspace changes what you see first. It never changes who signs.
All three are watchable on the homepage, switchable with one click, and the live workspace lets you run the tools yourself. Pick your seat.